The Scent of Fear is Now Available!
It’s been a very long road but I’m really excited to announce that my debut novel The Scent of Fear is now available!
Click here to order the e-book
Click here to order a Trade Paperback
I am so excited to share this novel with you. The concept of this story has been bouncing around in my head for the past decade but I never had the time to write it until I left law enforcement. It has taken a lot of twists and turns but I am thrilled with the result. I am already working on the next book in the trilogy and will keep you all posted on major developments at my new website.
Touring The Crime Lab: The Photography Lab
Photographic labs have undergone tremendous changes since the adoption of digital technology. For the edification of our historical writers I’ll try to paint a brief picture of the largely extinct film based labs. When I first began my career photography labs dealt with film. We used primarily 35mm color but occasionally dealt with Polaroid and Medium format cameras as well as specialty films like infra-red. Photographic film is, of course, sensitive to light. Controlled exposure to light (by proper apearature and shutter speed settings) is how a picture is imparted onto the film. That being the case, photographic laboratories contained a darkroom. A darkroom could range in size from a small closet to a 500 sq. ft. area but they all had one thing in common and that was the ability to be “light tight”. That means no windows and seals around doors to prevent “light leakage”. Some rooms even had neat revolving doors which were round spaces about 4 feet in diameter with a 2/3 sized opening which kept light from entering the darkroom as the technician entered the darkroom.
Developing film requires one to process the film through various chemical developers and washes (developer, bleach, fixative, wash). Prior to the 1960′s this was largely done with trays of chemical solutions. The photographer would take the film and dip it in each tray for a predetermined period of time until the image was developed and then hung to air dry. As police began taking more photographs it became necessary to automate this process. These machines contained tanks of the necessary chemicals and a conveyor belt like system to drag the filmstrip through the chemical at a predetermined speed (exposure). The rollers on these machines had to be cleaned everyday to keep the accumulated chemistry from building up and possibly scratching the negative. It was messy and smelly. One colleague actually worked in the FBI photo lab back in the Hoover days and was required to wear a 3-piece suit while working with these chemicals!
Working in a darkroom takes skill. You would have to be able to break open the film container, attach the film to leader cards, and feed the cards in complete darkness. Some labs used red lights that in theory didn’t harm the film but most did not. Needless to say we used small tabs of glow in the dark tape to highlight tools and latches we had to find in the dark. I stubbed a lot of toes and banged a lot of knees. There would be one piece of equipment for processing film and another similar machine for printing the image onto paper. Each of these could be 4′ high x 2′ wide x 6′-8′ long. Later versions (C-41) could be used under normal lighted conditions with the invention of certain loading devices that could extract the film from the canister without exposing it to light. But starting in the mid to late 1990′s the digital wave took the industry by storm making these darkrooms largely unnecessary (although some labs still use a large printer for printing large numbers of digital images onto paper).
The modern police photo lab is pretty simple by comparison and doesn’t require nearly the same amount of real estate. Images are processed and stored on a computer instead of the old large processors. Again, in the old days you had to have huge file drawers or cabinets to store all those film negative strips. One piece of equipment that has survived the transition is the copy stand. The copy stand is a mounting system that allows the CSI to mount the camera on a perpendicular plane to the evidence being photographed. Most have adjustable arms with lights for oblique lighting as well.It’s very handy when doing close-up photography where you need a steady platform. It also frees up your hands to operate other equipment like an ALS.
Another area that is commonly used is the “privacy room”. CSIs sometimes have to take pictures of sensitive areas (genitalia) from living victims. You can’t just ask them to drop their trousers in the main lobby right? You need a place that respects their privacy. That means no windows. Good photographers also like to use an industry standard 18% Grey colored background. This is the grey color you see in a lot of modern mugshots. The specific color allows photographers to calibrate the accuracy of the colors when printing. You can have the paint mixed to that color at any hardware store and simply paint the walls. It’s inexpensive and very effective. Some labs also use colored “curtains” or backdrops similar to what you might find in a commercial studio for the same effect.
Like any other room in the lab we still need plenty of drawers and cabinets to store the various lenses, filters, camera bodies, scales (rulers) and other nifty tools we use while photographing evidence and people. More sophisticated labs even have posable mannequins for use in displaying items of clothing or reconstructing body positions in reconstruction for court exhibits but that is a topic for another posting!
Do Detectives Really Taste-test Drugs?
Remember all those great movie scenes where the detective dips his pinky finger into the bag of white powder and touches it to the tip of his tongue? Makes for dramatic television right? Do you think that’s actually what detectives do? For the real scoop on how drugs are field tested and why taste-testing is such a bad idea come check out my guest posting today on the Crime Fiction Collective here.
Ashes to Ashes: Do Arson Fires Really Destroy a Body?
This is a question I get from time to time so today I have a guest posting here to discuss the issue. A lot of people mistakenly believe that it is easy to completely destroy a body with fire; and while you can certainly do a lot of damage, destroying it completely is very difficult. It’s easy to think that fires are so destructive because we see what they can do to houses, forests, and the like but the truth is a bit more complex. If you have a scene like this in your novel stop on over at Stuff & Non-sense to take a look.
Searching for Trace Evidence Part 1: The Suspect
Trace evidence can be a very powerful tool establishing a link between a suspect and the victim or crime scene. In fact, the phrase “caught red-handed” refers to the guilt associated to a man having bloody hands. Bloody hands tend to prove that the suspect was in contact with the bloody victim (although technically may fall short of proving he committed the act). Bloodstained hands can be easily washed but trace evidence may persist for days, weeks, even years after the crime. CSI’s learn to search for trace evidence in areas the suspect may not consider and here are a few examples.
Hair – The suspect’s hair may be a great reservoir of trace evidence, especially blood or fibers that may become entangled. Even if they wash their hands you may have several more hours before they wash their hair.
Nose & Ears – These are one of those locations that some CSIs forget about but nostrils and ears can trap important trace evidence like gunshot residue (GSR) or safe insulation. The nostril and ear canal contain hairs specifically designed to trap foreign particles and prevent them from entering the body so it makes sense that some types of trace evidence may become trapped as well.
Clothing & Jewelry - Trace evidence loves to get caught up in places like pockets, pant cuffs, and watch bands. Some evidence like soils, broken glass, or plant materials can also get wedged into shoe treads. Even if the suspect washes his clothing items like paint chips, seeds, and sand may be trapped in pockets and cuffs just waiting for a guy like me. Watchbands made of those flexible links may also hold trace amounts of blood not visible to a suspect. Remember, most men don’t clean their watch bands.
Vehicle – Suspects often take vehicles to their crimes and during their getaway may leave behind valuable evidence. This is especially true if the vehicle has dark interior colors (making evidence like blood harder to see). A suspect wearing bloodstained gloves may not realize he has left the victim’s blood on the steering wheel or door handle. He may also leave traces of blood or soil on the gas and brake pedals.
Residence – Suspects can even bring trace evidence all the way home. For example, a guy with muddy boots may kick them off in the garage breaking off chunks of the dirt onto the floor. Even if he picks them up and washes them there may still be dirt from the crime scene on the floor or swept under a cabinet.
So when you are developing your story think about what types of trace evidence you can use and how it might be “hidden” until the time your CSI finds it and blows the case wide open. Check back in a week or two for the next installment dealing with the crime scene.
The Color of Fly Puparia
I’ve written before about maggots and how Forensic Entomologists use insect evidence in murder cases. Once maggots are done feeding on a body they will enter a pre-pupal or wandering phase and migrate to a safe place to pupate. The puparium is better known as a cocoon. It is the hardened cuticle (skin) that protects the pupa during its metamorphosis from a maggot to the adult winged fly. Maggots will spend approximately two-thirds of their immature life in this stage before emerging as an adult. During this time the puparium will go through several color changes.
Maggots are a milky white color prior to this stage so it makes sense that the initial pupal stage is a whitish-yellow color. As the maggot ages the cuticle will darken in color. After yellow, the casing will turn a reddish-rust color then brown. At first it might be a lighter brown and then darken to a deeper brown. At this point the adult fly will usually emerge by pushing through one end of the casing.
The pupal casing is extremely durable and can persist in the soil for thousands of years. Archaeologists have actually used ancient pupal casings to help identify the season of death at sites of bison kills and other dead animals in a similar way to a forensic examination. Fortunately, most murder investigations are much younger in age. The best way to use these color changes in your novel is through photography or personal observation by the detective.
Over the years I have had several cases where the pupal cases cold be seen in photographs but were not collected. Most of the time this is because detectives just didn’t recognize them as evidence. But if the cases are yellowish then I know they are at the beginning of their development. If they are dark brown to black they are much further along. It’s not exactly a precise measurement but it’s usually better than having just the maggots from the body. You may not even have photographs and instead have to rely on the visual observations of officers or detectives. Again, not ideal, but it’s usually better than nothing.
You can get pretty crazy with your descriptions or dialog. Detectives sometimes refer to these casings as rodent droppings. I’ve heard of cases where the detectives will actually take them to a wildlife biologist or scat expert in an attempt to determine what animal dropped them. I’ve often wondered how such an expert wold react if they were told the scene was littered with yellow droppings. It might take them a while to figure out that the evidence was from insects and not rodents! However you choose to use this information just remember that color changes can vary and aren’t as precise as other aging methods.
Nextel Phones and Other Annoying Things CSIs Deal With
Today I have a new posting on the Crime Fiction Collective on some of the little things that can annoy a criminalist and how to incorporate little challenges into your character development. You can find the posting here.
Defining Trace Evidence
“Trace Evidence” is a term that is commonly used by detectives and forensic scientists but may not be widely understood by others. The term gained prevalence in a series of three papers written by Edmond Locard in 1930 and published in the American Journal of Police Science. The papers define what has become known as the Locard Theory of Exchange. Basically, the theory holds that whenever two things come into contact with one another they will likely leave “traces” of their presence with each other. Imagine a man walking across a muddy field. He leaves behind shoe print impressions and in return the muddy soil will cling to his shoes. That scenario creates an “exchange” between the scene and the suspect. obviously, the more activity and participants in a given crime scene, the greater the potential for such exchange.
I’m not wedded to any particular definition but I think many criminalists would agree that when they think of “trace evidence” they imagine small items normally examined with a microscope. Others might also include impression evidence from shoes and tires but, as an author, you needn’t concern yourself with parsing it all out. I have previously described how criminalists “touch” evidence to minimize any exchange and/or destruction of this valuable evidence. But, detectives rely on this exchange to prove connections between the suspect, victim, and crime scene. As authors you can use various types of trace evidence to drive an investigation and challenge your characters. Trace evidence can be divided into several categories. Here are a few (of many) examples:
Biological:
- DNA (blood, semen, saliva)
- Hairs (human, pet, livestock)
- Fingerprints
- Stomach contents (vomit)
Physical:
- Synthetic fibers (clothing, carpet)
- Paint chips
- Safe insulation
- Glass fragments
Natural:
- Botanical (pollen, seeds, plant fragments)
- Geological (soil, sand)
I will soon post some articles describing how and where CSIs search for this trace evidence so keep checking back!
Amazing Resource For Firearm Manuals
Some fiction writers like Stephen Hunter, Vince Flynn, Brad Thor, C.J. Box, or Tara Janzen are very knowledgeable about firearms. Others; not so much. Not a big deal, we all have to learn and research a variety of topics for our novels and even knowledgeable authors need to look up the specifics from time to time. You might need to know how many cartridges a particular gun will hold, the rate of fire, or the muzzle velocity. Sometimes authors aren’t even sure what they want to put in their protagonist’s hands and want to “shop around” to narrow down their choices based on features or looks.
Introducing the Steves Pages website. Steve offers over 2,500 .pdf manuals for hundreds of firearms. He even has manuals for cameras, flashlights, optics, and metal detectors! It is a fabulous and FREE resource for authors looking to get some specifics about the guns they are writing about. His main page has even more materials from out-of-print books and magazines, Army field manuals, and much, much, more! If you want to add some additional details about the guns your characters are using you might want to see if he has a manual listed that can give you the information you need.










